Quality Assurance Consulting: What a QA Maturity Assessment Actually Produces
This guide explains what a QA maturity assessment scores you against, what the deliverable looks like on the last day, and when advisory work is the wrong purchase.
Vervali modernises systems that still run the business: assessment of what the current system does and what it costs to keep, re-platforming or rebuild, data migration with reconciliation, and regression testing of the old and new systems against the same inputs so you can see they behave the same before you switch. Cutover happens with a rehearsed rollback in place.
ISO/IEC 17025:2017Accredited testing laboratory
CMMI Maturity Level 3The process is written down and repeats
ISO 9001:2015Quality management
ISO/IEC 27001Information security
The buyer on this page has a system that still runs the business and is afraid of breaking it. US teams get this work in US hours, 9am to 1pm Eastern, with delivery from India, from an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab with CMMI Level 3 process. Four mechanisms sit at the top, not a transformation slogan: a parallel run, data reconciliation, regression comparison of old and new against the same inputs, and a rehearsed rollback that has been timed. The decision to abort is a decision, not a panic.
Cutover happens with that rollback in place. Book a modernization review if you already know the estate. A free assessment of one system is the first look.
Parallel Run and Regression
Both systems process the same inputs and the outputs are compared. Regression testing of the old and new against those inputs is how you see they behave the same before you switch. Method for that pass sits on application testing.
Reconciliation and Rehearsed Rollback
Counts and balances are signed before anyone cuts over. The rollback is timed in rehearsal, not invented on the night. If the comparison fails, you stay on the system that still works. That is the product of a modernization review.
Need the old and new systems compared before you switch? Book a modernization review, or start with a free assessment of one system.
Book a ReviewRehost, re-platform, refactor and rebuild. Each has a cost, a fix, and something it leaves behind. Rehosting fixes the hardware problem and none of the software problems. A lift and shift sold as modernisation is the most common disappointment in this market. We name the approach in the quote so you are not buying a rebuild under a rehost label.
Rehost moves the same software onto new infrastructure. Re-platform changes the runtime, the database or the hosting shape without rewriting the business rules. Cloud-native targets on AWS and Azure are the platforms Vervali builds on. The plan can name the clouds you already run. A lift to new hardware with the same defects still inside is not modernisation.
Refactor splits outdated applications using microservices, containers and a modern architecture so you improve agility without a full rewrite. Rebuild replaces the system. ERP, CRM and custom cores sit here when the old product cannot carry the next process. Cutover testing for those platforms sits with ERP and CRM development. A custom rebuild sits on custom software development.
This is the part that actually goes wrong. Mapping fields where the old system's meaning is not the new system's meaning. Handling records that were never valid. Deciding what history moves and what is archived. Proving after the move that nothing was lost or duplicated.
The reconciliation report contains counts, balances, duplicates found, records that would not map, and the list of what was archived rather than moved. Backups and an audit trail sit in that pack. You sign that report before cutover, not after the first week in production.
When the legacy system runs on something the vendor no longer supports, or will not let you leave, the job is data extraction where there is no export, and rewriting the interface rather than the whole system. We do not pretend every closed box has a clean dump. What we could not see goes on the risk register. Open-source or a cloud target is a later choice, after the data you own is actually yours. A free assessment of one system is how we see that constraint.
A migration resets the evidence and an auditor will ask. Access control, audit logging, retention, and any certification scope the old system carried have to be re-established rather than assumed. GDPR and HIPAA are named when they apply to you. Vervali tests a client's systems for SOC 2 readiness and is not itself SOC 2 certified. ISO/IEC 27001 is the information-security management system we run. Detail and evidence packs sit on compliance testing when that pass is in the quote. Cloud execution of a move sits on cloud migration and modernisation and on cloud application development.
An ageing system costs money in maintenance, in the shrinking pool of people who can work on it, in the integrations it blocks, and in the compliance exposure of software that can no longer be patched. That is the shape of the internal case. We will not invent a typical savings percentage we cannot evidence. The quote after a free assessment of one system names what it costs to keep the current stack versus what the first move costs. Year two of doing nothing is still a number. It is just not on an invoice from us.
Enterprise work from Vervali's records, by sector and country. The banking platforms and the operations platform. Migration work sat inside those jobs. They are not a claim that those were standalone legacy-only migrations.
India · two private-sector banks
60% faster loan processing and 50% less agent onboarding time, with the compliance the engagement required. Platforms like that do not move in one weekend. Assessment, a sequence, data that still balances, and a rollback you have timed are how a core that still runs the business is allowed to change.
60% faster loan processing 50% less agent onboarding timeIndia · manufacturer · operations platform
40% less manual stock reconciliation on a sales-operations platform. That is what changes when the old record and the new process finally agree. A cutover without that reconciliation is how month-end becomes a war room.
40% less manual stock reconciliationOur Expertise
Trusted by 150+ Leading Brands
A Strong Team of 275+ QA and Dev Professionals
Worked across 450+ Successful Projects