Mobile App Testing Services in 2026: Devices, Store Rules and Cost
This guide explains what mobile app testing services cover, how to size a device matrix from United States traffic data, and what Apple and Google check before a rel…
Vervali tests the infrastructure your application runs on: servers and operating systems, network devices and segmentation, firewall and access rules, cloud configuration and identity permissions, and the exposed services an attacker would find first. Findings are risk-ranked with a remediation path, and every engagement ends with a retest of the agreed in-scope assets.
ISO/IEC 17025:2017Accredited testing laboratory
CMMI Maturity Level 3The process is written down and repeats
ISO 9001:2015Quality management
ISO/IEC 27001Information security
The hosts, the network and the configuration your application runs on, not the application itself. US product and security teams get this work in US hours, 9am to 1pm Eastern, with delivery from India, under ISO/IEC 27001. Scope is the agreed in-scope assets. We do not claim certified security staff. A finding here is a host nobody patched, a segment that is not a segment, or a service an attacker finds before your monitoring does.
Missing patches, default accounts, services that should not be listening, and configuration that still matches last year's build image. A finding looks like an unauthenticated service on an internal host, or a kernel that has been public for months. We check the agreed in-scope servers, not a neighbour you did not name.
Whether the diagram still matches the traffic. Routing, VLAN and trust boundaries, management planes left on the production network. A finding looks like a jump from a guest VLAN into a payment segment, or a device still using a community string from the install guide.
Rules that were temporary and became permanent, any-any leftovers, and admin paths that should not be reachable from the internet. A finding looks like an old port still open for a vendor who left, or remote desktop on a host that was supposed to sit behind a jump box.
IAM sprawl, public storage, security groups that drifted, and logging that is off on the account that matters. A finding looks like a bucket readable from the internet, or a role that can assume more than the ticket said. Deeper compliance work sits on the cloud page, linked below.
What answers on the public surface of the agreed in-scope assets: VPN, mail, remote access, forgotten admin panels, and development hosts that still have a DNS name. A finding looks like a staging login on the internet, or a service banner that still names the version.
Need hosts, network and configuration tested, not another application scan? Book a scoping call, or start with a free external exposure check on one domain.
Book a CallTwo pages, two jobs. This page is the infrastructure layer: hosts, network and configuration. The penetration testing page is the full engagement across applications, APIs, mobile and infrastructure. Pick the problem you actually have. We do not run both as two invoices for the same week unless you asked for both.
The problem is servers, segmentation, firewalls, cloud IAM and the services that answer on the internet. You want those agreed in-scope assets tested, a risk-ranked report, and a retest. Related layer work sits on network security testing.
You need an authorised attacker across the application, API, mobile and infrastructure, with controlled exploitation inside agreed limits. Penetration testing and VAPT is that method. The security overview that routes the rest of the set is security testing.
Most infrastructure now is cloud configuration rather than a rack you can point at. On this page that means identity and permission sprawl, public storage, network exposure and logging on the agreed in-scope accounts. We say what we checked and what a finding looks like. We do not turn this section into a second copy of the cloud compliance page.
HIPAA, PCI DSS and SOC 2 readiness evidence, encryption programmes and auditor packs live on cloud security and compliance. Vervali tests a client's systems for SOC 2 readiness and is not itself SOC 2 certified. If the question is "is this account exposed," stay here. If the question is "will this evidence survive an auditor," go there.
Reconnaissance, service enumeration, vulnerability identification, manual verification, and controlled exploitation within the agreed limits. The difference between a scan and a test is somebody confirming the finding is real. Tools named because they were used on the work: Tenable, OpenVAS, Metasploit, Wireshark. A scanner dump with no owner is not the engagement.
What answers on the agreed in-scope assets, from the outside and from the segments you named. OpenVAS and Tenable widen the first pass. Wireshark is for the traffic that the diagram said should not exist.
Every high and critical is confirmed by a person before it is a finding. False positives stay out of the report. That is the step a weekend scan skips, and the step an engineer will actually trust.
Metasploit and manual follow-up only inside the agreed limits. Proof that the path is real, not a smash of production. If a step would take a service down, we stop and write what we would have done.
Findings risk-ranked with a stated basis, the reproduction, the evidence, and the remediation path. Then a short summary that names the two or three things that would actually cause harm, so a CISO does not have to mine a 60-page appendix for the sentence that matters.
Engineering gets enough to fix it. Leadership gets enough to decide order. An auditor gets a list that maps to the agreed in-scope assets. We do not bury a critical finding on page 47 because the scanner numbered it that way. Recovery testing of backups and failovers, when that is the question, sits on disaster recovery testing.
Every engagement ends with a retest of the agreed in-scope assets. Findings are revalidated after your team fixes them. That retest is part of the original work rather than a second sale. We do not invent a day-rate for it on this page.
Schedule it once your owners say the fixes are in. If a new release changes the surface, that is a new scope, not a free extension of the last one. 100% coverage of agreed in-scope on the retest, same as the first pass.
Our Expertise
Trusted by 150+ Leading Brands
A Strong Team of 275+ QA and Dev Professionals
Worked across 450+ Successful Projects